There are
many different ways to teach skills and concepts to children. There are whole
group, small group, and individualized strategies. While some are better for
teaching certain types of content, one method that is very useful for teaching
skills in an inductive way is through discrete trial training (DTT).
DTT is
typically done one-to-one with an instructor and a child in a very structured environment.
The clinician contrives the learning environment very intently. Some general examples
of these environmental manipulations may be to minimize distractions for
acquisition targets, or have distractions present to check for mastery of
skills and/or generalization.
By
generalization, it is meant that the skill or behavior is emitted under
numerous conditions and across people and settings and materials. For example,
if a target skill is to expressively identify a car, a clinician may start with
basic pictures of cars, then use Matchbox cars. To oversimplify the concept of
generalization, the goal is that the learner is able to understand that there
are multiple examples of cars, but they are all still cars. Being able to
identify multiple examples of cars can then lead to greater understandings
about cars and the world in general, such as that cars drive on the road, but
so do buses, and buses carry children to school, so on and so forth.
Essentially, we want to make the child’s world larger, and a good way to ensure
this is happening is by checking for generalization of skills and behaviors
across examples and settings and people.
Each trial
in a DTT sequence is documented on a data sheet for correct and incorrect
responses. When an incorrect response is given, we mark the level of prompting
(vocal, gestural, model, physical, to name a few) necessary for the child to
respond correctly. We then go into the next trial for the same target, to see
if learning has occurred. As we move through the trials, the prompt is faded
out; however, after 2 incorrect responses, the clinician typically goes into an
errorless teaching format.
In errorless
teaching the learner is fully prompted to respond, thereby not allowing for an opportunity
to respond incorrectly. We run the
errorless procedure 3 times, and then run what is termed a transfer trial – or
a trial that allows the learner respond independently – to check if learning
has occurred.
DTT as a
teaching protocol is not without some controversy. Some people claim it leads
to rote responding, or creates mechanical like responding. However, in light of
this criticism, one ought to ask themselves if it would be better to have the
child not learning at all? Additionally, through checking for generalization,
we ensure that rote responding is decreased. DTT is specialized in that it
creates learning opportunities for children who may not have the prerequisite
skills for larger group based instruction. With this in mind, DTT can therefore
be useful for getting children to the point where they are available for more
natural, group based instruction.
DTT is
extremely useful because it has the learner practicing the skill or behavior
with individualized support and opportunities for incorrect responding are
lessened, thereby increasing the rate of learning.
No comments:
Post a Comment